View Single Post
Old 11-12-2010, 16:01   #36
punky
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Age: 44
Posts: 14,750
punky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aura
punky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aura
Re: Katie Price complains to Ofcom over Frankie Boyle gag

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
Do you take 'always' to be an absolute, or are there limits? Do you see any circumstances at all where someone's freedom to say something grossly offensive should be curbed?
Not with regards to causing offense. There is no concrete definition of what "offence" is. It's something that every individual person sets the boundary of. A couple of hundred years ago taking the lord's name in vain was offensive. To a tiny minority it still is. Same with insulting royals. How can people be held account to something that's impossible to define?
punky is offline   Reply With Quote