Cable Forum - View Single Post

Chrysalis · 29-11-2010, 13:15

ok but we know in le3 there is downstream congestion on legacy and even some on overlay albeit much less severe. its on at least 2 legacy ports as philce had it on legacy and I also had it on legacy. I expect many light takeup areas elsewhere in the country have much less than 300 per downstream as insufficent sales.

80:1 contention ratio is much higher than the amount I seen you post in another post, cant remember which site it was (think was tbb) and is quite a high number. Even on a large backhaul (eg. 1gigabit) that is high. We will disagree on if we think its reasonable, I have evidence to say it isnt in the performance we see here. Some VM areas have less than 50 on a downstream port.

So if resegmenting is sometimes only moving from one card to another (I assume the cards are in close proximity to each other) then why does it take many months to do the work? and what happens if all cards are saturated?

29-11-2010, 13:15	#88
Chrysalis Inactive Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 12,047	Re: Terrible performance Leicester (LE3) ok but we know in le3 there is downstream congestion on legacy and even some on overlay albeit much less severe. its on at least 2 legacy ports as philce had it on legacy and I also had it on legacy. I expect many light takeup areas elsewhere in the country have much less than 300 per downstream as insufficent sales. 80:1 contention ratio is much higher than the amount I seen you post in another post, cant remember which site it was (think was tbb) and is quite a high number. Even on a large backhaul (eg. 1gigabit) that is high. We will disagree on if we think its reasonable, I have evidence to say it isnt in the performance we see here. Some VM areas have less than 50 on a downstream port. So if resegmenting is sometimes only moving from one card to another (I assume the cards are in close proximity to each other) then why does it take many months to do the work? and what happens if all cards are saturated?