Quote:
Originally Posted by lymmranger
This is being discussed in great detail in the very place you mention, it would appear that "legally" certain information has to be kept.
BUT....
The info required to identify an account holder does not (i.e. info of interest to ACS etc). It would also appear that each ISP has a slightly different privacy policy and has different views on how long it decides to keep logs for
I find it quite confusing, but reckon it does add to the argument that what little evidence they hold against you is seriously flawed
|
Agreed, the question was asked about the ISPs who started to contest but were in posession of information, ie TalkTalk and Virgin as to if they had to hold onto that information or if they could destroy it once they were dropped from the court order and wondered what peoples thoughts were on the subject.
Someone asked if we could start to see TalkTalk or Virgin Media customers from a long time ago being contacted through previosly supplied ACS lists if either of these companies were forced into a change of heart or decided to consent in future.
---------- Post added at 11:55 ---------- Previous post was at 11:14 ----------
Possable update.
From a post on Slyck
Initial post regarding new company made around the end of June this year,
So we have ACS making a new firm called Larper Limited, linked to an IT company whos director worked for Davenport Lyons and who is linked to a previous data controller NG3Systems.
I'm sure it is just a coincidence I wonder if this would be a way for Andy to dodge the SDT maybe working in a 'consultancy' role and passing information from ACS to Larper if he was shutdown saying that he had a responsability to his clients??? If that is the case then it is surely making a mockery of the whole SDT process.
Essentially if he is struck off offering is work to 'another firm' and starting again. I wonder if this was him forward planning