|
Re: Unemployed could be forced to do compulsory manual labour
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis
The fear of assessments comes from the fact that the assessments are biased, legitimately ill people get results coming back saying they fit for work. This was even happening on the old assessment never mind the new one. In the days of hand written reports doctors used to alter reports with false information after the claimant had signed the old one off. These are the barriers claimants are up against, that non claimants dont realise happens.
Estimations of money gained by government due to (a) people not claiming when they entitled and (b) people been wrongfully kicked of benefit due to rules that are too harsh is greater than money claimed to be lost due to fraud, making the latter a smaller problem.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis
why would the NOTW and mail post a story about claimants been unfairly denied benefit? to those papers they ****. Newspapers all have agendas.
The bbc was offered case details, hard proof, and proof of a doctor been reprimanded by atos origin but wouldnt print the story due to it "not been in the public's interest" and that was the bbc never mind someone like the NOTW.
The proproganda has been very effective as people here simply refuse to believe whats going on.
|
Could I just point out there's a huge difference between your initial assertion (that this was widespread) and your latest (a single instance).
You also appear to be stating that ATOS reprimanded a doctor for doing what you said they wanted (certify people as being fit for work when they weren't), or are you saying they reprimanded him/her for saying that people weren't fit for work? Any links?
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|