View Single Post
Old 10-11-2010, 17:15   #212
Mr Angry
Inactive
 
Mr Angry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belfast
Posts: 4,785
Mr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny stars
Mr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Unemployed could be forced to do compulsory manual labour

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis View Post
If thats what you want to believe fine.
Its not what I believe, it's actually what you believe and what you posted. Let me remind you. You said "the result of the appeal is not important". So bang goes your pretence of caring for the ill and vulnerable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis View Post
If you were the DWP you wouldnt let someone be prosecuted for it as the repurcussions to the benefit system would be enormous and would open a claim floodgate.
Again, baseless and factually incorrect. The crown has immunity - Doctors and Atos Orign staff (both of whom you have attempted to malign without a shred of factual legal proof) are not - so why have none of their numbers been prosecuted or found guilty of the allegations you have levelled against them?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis View Post
Instead they most likely get internally disiciplined.
Again you are hypothesizing over something you have no factual understanding of.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis View Post
Also the vast majority of claimants wont have the energy or will power to go after individual's, their priority is their own claim. I dont even know if a doctor has been taken to court.
So, it's now the ill peoples fault for not pursuing their claim to have been defrauded by members of a profession you previously alleged to be rife with fraud and practitioners of acts contrary to the Fraud Act.

I'll tell you what Chrysalis, why don't you - given the fact that you maintain that you have seen dozens of instances of this fraud which you allege - take a case for them? Armed with the quantity and quality of the information and evidence you allege, but have yet to prove, you have I'd be surprised if the defence lawyers would even bother turning up such is the incontravertable nature (allegedly) of same.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis View Post
The fact is reports have been altered post medical, this information can be found by googling but I am not going to do it for you due to the way you have treated this, the uncertianty of it is, is who does it and why this has been done. Even reports that havent been altered, on lima as well there is instances of reports giving factually incorrect information which leads to a false score. This I have personally seen dozens of times.
Yes, of course, I should have realized. Given the fact that you as a sole individual have, allegedly, seen dozens of instances of fraudulent behaviour on the part of doctors completing assessments it's no wonder that Google and the National Archive are literally coming down with examples exactly the same as the dozens you have, allegedly, seen.

Oh, wait.....

There you go again, expecting the world and his sister to alter their perception of reality simply because you "say so" and, per usual, provide no substantive proof or evidence of what, exactly, you have based your "experiences" on. You make yourself look ridiculous with your "bad boys did it and ran away" attempts at defending your fantastical and entirely unfounded allegations (which you are now trying frantically to backtrack from).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis View Post
Now I am curious as to why a claim that the medical system is working wrong negatively against claimants is a subject that you so interested in.
Because, unlike yourself, I have a factually based interest in the state affording care and protection to the ill and vulnerable.
Mr Angry is offline   Reply With Quote