Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis
I have linked you to an article on it.
|
No, you haven't.
You have linked to an article which speculates on the possibility of it happening (and coincidentally contradicts your earlier assertion regarding the reasoning behind the introduction of LiMA).
You stated, unequivocally
"In the days of hand written reports doctors used to alter reports with false information after the claimant had signed the old one off. These are the barriers claimants are up against, that non claimants dont realise happens." and further
"(b) in hand written assessments it is not unknown for the assessor to change what they have written after the claimant has signed it off."
Neither you, nor the article, have provided any proof, whatsoever, of action having been taken or charges having been brought against any individual (medical professional or otherwise) in relation to offences committed under the Forgery and Counterfeiting Act of 1981 in relation to the allegations you have made on this forum.
Now, again. Where is your proof to back up your allegations of fraud being committed by medical professionals in relation to these assessments and where is your proof that LiMA was introduced to prevent such occurances?