View Single Post
Old 07-11-2010, 00:58   #14
Mr Angry
Inactive
 
Mr Angry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belfast
Posts: 4,785
Mr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny stars
Mr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Unemployed could be forced to do compulsory manual labour

Quote:
Originally Posted by punky View Post
Because I am not rich? I certainly don't work for fun.
Sorry, I'll ask you again. Who "forced" or forces you to work?

Quote:
Originally Posted by punky View Post
Read the article again - it is the long-term jobless not the long-term sick
There is no distinction made in the article. Are you saying that the long term jobless, irrespective of the circumstances which lead to their being "jobless", should all be tarred with the same brush?

Quote:
Originally Posted by punky View Post
Again - read the article. This isn't about sick or "vunerable" people. It is the long-term work shy that won't work because they know the government will give still give them money if they don't.
Sorry, point of fact. Long term "work shy" is your chosen terminology - not what I am referencing.
Mr Angry is offline   Reply With Quote