Quote:
Originally Posted by pauldavies83
Maybe I'm not wanting it for either of these things? Maybe (as many others), I just want a PVR that doesn't:
Take an age to change channels
Require constant reboots
Can get hot enough to cook dinner on top
Misses the start/end of programs
They do have a right to charge what they want - its a business, I'm well aware of that. I never said they didn't have the right to do this.
I don't see why you have quoted my post - you haven't actually agreed or disagreed with anything i've said. You have just said, if you don't like it, don't pay for it. Doesn't really help the discussion. And if everyone took that view, where would be the need for innovation. Everyone would just sit on their laurels.
|
becuase oyu are saying since it ais a pvr it should be free liek teh v+ i am syaing it is different and sky also charge a premium for there premium pvr
---------- Post added at 15:03 ---------- Previous post was at 15:02 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by passingbat
Maybe you have shares in Virgi Media? That may account for 'encouraging' a monthly fee as well as a one off upfront payment 
When the TV drive was launched, both sky and Virgin charged a monthly fee for PVR functionality. Both have now dropped that. Don't encorage these companies (by posting a willing aceptance of it) to go back to those days. |
sky charge for there 1tb pvr drive s why shouldnt virign? 1tb disk are expesive at least the pvr type ones
i never said it was right i am jsut givinga reaosn why it ill eb charged for