Quote:
Originally Posted by mersey70
£20 (2 packs) would cover all of Sky's entertainment and lifestyle channels but more importantly the attached on demand content plus a lot more FTA content like CBS. Anyway I agree we are off topic and I doubt we will ever agree which is fine, it's just my opinion and it will not change. For the lower tier packages I think Sky offers far more than VM which I guess is what I am saying.
|
I've take the liberty of moving this to a more appropriate thread Mersey.
Sky don't really have lower tier packages like VM whose packages start at £6.50. The two packages you mention would cost £20, three times as much, but for £4.50 more than Sky's two packages you get ESPN and more HD plus a lot of channels much more popular than CBS. As for on demand they would lose catch up tv, and tv choice from the four most popular channels. Even though you say you don't want ESPN you still find the xl package to be sufficient value for money so it is not difficult to see why many people would find it to be much better vfm than the Sky two packs you suggested.