Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
Ah, xenophobia - excellent. What about those companies that were predominately chinese since their inception Mick, do they not count? Which particular recording companies do you anticipate being sold off to either Indian or Chinese interests and on what (besides excusal xenophobia) do you base your predictions on?
Yes, maybe it is. Is that something worth celebrating simply because self centered freetards and apologists for theft have, for too long, been oblivious to the reality of the fiscal impact of their activities and their espousal of the notion that "sharing is caring".
Well, lets see that in action, let's see them sharing the burden of shouldering the losses - or is it perhaps the case that's a kind of "sharing" that's beyond the selfish utopian nonsense they spout?
|
a) Sony? No, hold on, they're Japanese.
Universal? No, hold on, they're French.
Warner? No, hold on, they're American.
EMI? Yes, they're British!! Hold on, though, they're owned by Venture Capitalists Terra Firma Capital Partners.
Who does that leave to sell to the Chinese or the Indians?
b) Don't you understand? Only by giving it away free, would the business model make sense - that way, they could use the cream they had skimmed off to pay for new artistes, so they could give more away free - your outmoded view and business model is what causes the problem.