View Single Post
Old 28-10-2010, 20:55   #20
Gary L
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,324
Gary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny star
Gary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny star
Re: Time Traveller on Mobile Phone in 1920's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh View Post


Are you saying that the Earth of 1940 was taken forward to the putative time-travellers home time (thus putting it in the same time-frame as the satellites, allowing the communications), or are you saying that the area around the Earth in the putative time-travellers present was taken back to the 1940s (taking the satellites with it to allow communications)?
I'll try and explain it a bit. is it like a rewind thing where everything goes backwards to the point you press Stop and Play?
if you could just go back in time, the future would still be there for you to return to. so the 'satellites' would still be there in the futures space time.

so unless it's a distance thing then the only problem would be contacting the satellites that are there in the future? and if it's not a rewind tape thing then why does space have to be affected by what's happened to the earth?

how far out would time travel expand in the way that millions of miles have to go back with the time on earth?
Gary L is offline   Reply With Quote