View Single Post
Old 28-10-2010, 18:58   #113
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: The Comprehensive Spending Review Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis View Post
Hugh compare our spending per head to other developed countries, you may be surprised. Thats a better comparison than comparing to 1990 another tory era of 'under' spending.
Is high government spending per head really any kind of metric to be happy about? This is essentially saying that the populace aren't grown up enough to use their own wealth so the government has to take it off them in taxation and spend it for them.

Just a thought when comparing our government spending to these many other developed countries:
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote