View Single Post
Old 20-10-2010, 18:16   #18
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: too fat to work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horace View Post
We need to start taxing overweight people in the same way we tax smokers, they put a huge burden on the health service and probably increase carbon emissions. Cruel but fair.
Or we could further tax the nasty crap that passes as 'food' that helped get them that way.

Sugar - The Bitter Truth is essential viewing. Common sugar that people put in their tea, have in sweets, etc, is 50% poison and should be treated as such. Ethanol is taxed to control its' consumption, the health impact of fructose over the long term is quite similar.

---------- Post added at 17:16 ---------- Previous post was at 17:12 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nugget View Post
Great, innit...

Even now, when I'm nearly 2 stone heavier than I was then, my BMI's still only 25.7 - technically overweight, but still not obese
29.4 here, nearly into obese territory, yay
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote