View Single Post
Old 17-10-2010, 20:02   #20
SlackDad
cf.geek
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 52
Posts: 805
SlackDad has reached the bronze age
SlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze age
Re: Benefit fraud measures outlined (crime increase?)

What is most interesting for me is how we interpret the idea of a crime. For instance some stats taken from here http://blogs.thisismoney.co.uk/2010/...racksuit.html:

Estimated cost of benefit fraud: £5.2 billion
Estimated saving of unclaimed benefit: £16 billion
Estimated cost of income tax and corporate tax evasion: £17 billion

Listening to all the rhetoric you'd think benefit fraud is far outweighing anything else which, in purely financial terms, it clearly isn't. But I suppose in terms of the political message and how far we can relate to or feel in some way personally affected by the crime benefit fraud will win every time. I mean it's much easier to feel 'robbed' by the 'sponger' up the road than a faceless corporation based on some offshore tax haven - especially with a copy of the Daily Mail in your hand.

And as for those benefits that go unclaimed well, who cares about that?

As for the OP question, 'will crime increase?' - I very much doubt it but I know where I'd like the govt to focus it's attention.
SlackDad is offline   Reply With Quote