I had the anon. caller rejection feature and noticed the same thing which defeated the point of me paying £2.50 a month extra. I had it removed and had caller ID instead (for only £2.00 a month extra so saving 50p
) and it's much more useful.
---------- Post added at 16:29 ---------- Previous post was at 16:26 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by inneedofhelp
Besides, since it is now possible to fake the number transmitted, caller display has become less effective.
|
That they can, but if the number is not in my phone's phone book then it doesn't get answered, simple as that (the answer machine or fax will get it instead).