Quote:
Originally Posted by roughbeast
I think we are agreeing. You said 'without' issues', but clearly there are issues, regardless of whose fault they are. VM would do well not to complain about their stats being misrepresented until they sort that issue out. Thing is, unless the test servers can be accessed with only 3 steps, router -> headend -> testserver, with a ping <3ms then there will always be access issues to one degree or another.
|
No I specifically said the TBB tester could handle 200Mbps, said nothing about the intervening networks and routes on the way.
Mr Telford was blaming the TBB tester for his poor speedtest which isn't the case.
Incidentally not having a test server sitting at your headend doesn't inevitably cause access issues to one degree or another. While you guys on trials get a speed tester stuck into your headend everyone else whose performance is measured goes onto the Samknows testing which is off network.
Your speedtest is purely devoted to measuring your access network performance for feedback to the trials team, it is pointless for anything else as the Internet doesn't live at Coventry headend
