View Single Post
Old 04-10-2010, 22:35   #124
Flyboy
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,375
Flyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful one
Re: Child Benefit Scrapped For Higher Rate Tax Payers From 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh View Post
Wasn't that originally one of the reasons why family allowance was introduced in the first place about 1946 i think to encourage people to have more kids after the war
Indeed it was. In fact, if the baby boom didn't happen the when it did, we would be in a far worse position than we are in today.

---------- Post added at 21:35 ---------- Previous post was at 21:27 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by peanut View Post
A good way of putting things into perspective from the Guardian.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2010...george-osborne
I can't see how the plumber in that example gets five thousand pounds a year in housing benefit, when he has a salary of nearly thirty thousand pounds a year.
Flyboy is offline   Reply With Quote