View Single Post
Old 04-10-2010, 22:23   #122
Flyboy
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,375
Flyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful one
Re: Child Benefit Scrapped For Higher Rate Tax Payers From 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by colin25 View Post
The problem with that logic, is that some have kids as a lifestyle choice, helps them get house, benefit,..there are families who only outlook is benefits, and kids who know no other way.

I'm not convinced that is the only, or best way. Far better to reward those who are willing to work..who recognise that to get somewhere you need to work hard.

But, I don't know the ideal solution..perhaps we give benefits for those who have worked for a period of time (put effort in, get it back), and we only support them while they work. And means test it, similar to what is suggested, income over a set amount doesn't qualify .

Not thought it through, but just know that presently it is a perverse incentive to some, and perverse benefit to others.

Not sure I'm invested in the subject to solve it, but I can certainly see the flaws of the present system. At present, universal benefits are unaffordable.

Ok..start the shooting
People do not have children just to get an extra thirteen pounds a week.
Flyboy is offline   Reply With Quote