View Single Post
Old 04-10-2010, 18:32   #79
danielf
cf.mega poser
 
danielf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,687
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
Re: Child Benefit Scrapped For Higher Rate Tax Payers From 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh View Post

From the Guardian

Quote:
Around 1.2 million families - those with one parent earning more than £43,875 a year - will be affected. This will cut around £1bn from the annual £12bn cost of child benefit. But another 6.6m families will not lose out. The average household income for a household containing a higher-rate taxpayer is £75,000. But households with two earners each earning less than the higher-rate threshold will continue to get child benefit, even if their combined income is more than £43,875.

There are around 900,000 families in this category. Osborne accepts that this is an anomaly, but he believes that any alternative would have been too complicated

I do have to say that an anomaly that misses > 40% of the target is quite an anomaly...
__________________
Remember kids: We are blessed with a listening, caring government.
danielf is offline   Reply With Quote