View Single Post
Old 04-10-2010, 16:05   #70
joglynne
Born again teenager.
 
joglynne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Manchester. (VM area 20)
Age: 77
Services: Maxit TV, M250 Fibre BB. Phone-Anytime Chatter
Posts: 13,852
joglynne has a golden aurajoglynne has a golden aurajoglynne has a golden aurajoglynne has a golden aura
joglynne has a golden aurajoglynne has a golden aurajoglynne has a golden aurajoglynne has a golden aurajoglynne has a golden aurajoglynne has a golden aurajoglynne has a golden aurajoglynne has a golden aurajoglynne has a golden aurajoglynne has a golden aurajoglynne has a golden aura
Re: Child Benefit Scrapped For Higher Rate Tax Payers From 2013

As HM Revenue and Customs is responsible for the payment of Child Benefit and controlling our Taxes it should be relatively cheap and simple to implement this proposal as it stands.

Obtaining the information to enable combining partners income however would be a completely different matter and would launch a raft of problems. For the extra number of individuals it would effect I predict it would not be a cost effective option at the moment.
__________________
"I intend to live forever, or die trying" - Groucho Marx..... "but whilst I do I shall do so disgracefully." Jo Glynne
joglynne is offline   Reply With Quote