View Single Post
Old 04-10-2010, 16:01   #69
danielf
cf.mega poser
 
danielf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,687
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
Re: Child Benefit Scrapped For Higher Rate Tax Payers From 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy View Post
But, yet again, the more rich are having less taken off of them, how is that a good thing?
Unfortunately, some rich people will be better off than some less rich people. These less rich people are still well off by general measures earning nearly twice the median salary without taking a potential second income into consideration. Not ideal, but generally a good thing as generally the wealthy will be losing a subsidy at minimal administrative cost. It seems you're the only one that opposes it, and I'm surprised by it given your general left wing leanings.

Frankly, I suspect that Chris has hit the nail squarely on the head regarding your motivations for your opposition.
__________________
Remember kids: We are blessed with a listening, caring government.
danielf is offline   Reply With Quote