View Single Post
Old 04-10-2010, 15:19   #54
danielf
cf.mega poser
 
danielf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,687
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
Re: Child Benefit Scrapped For Higher Rate Tax Payers From 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy View Post
Okay then, why don't they go after those who earn a higher joint income, rather than those who earn a modest single income?
I'm guessing it's because 1. It is cheaper to administer and 2. In reality there won't be that many with 'a modest income', as many families where one of the partner earns over £44k will be on dual incomes as well.

As said earlier, the measure is crude, but it's crudeness makes it cheap, and the general purpose of the measure is in the right direction. On balance therefore, I think this is a good move.
__________________
Remember kids: We are blessed with a listening, caring government.
danielf is offline   Reply With Quote