View Single Post
Old 04-10-2010, 15:12   #51
Chris
Trollsplatter
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,224
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Re: Child Benefit Scrapped For Higher Rate Tax Payers From 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy View Post
But why should a couple, who earn nearly ninety-thousand pounds a year, be treated better than those who earn less? I can see self-employed people fiddling their incomes to balance their earnings more equally, with their partners, to make sure that neither of them earn more than the high rate threshold. It will remove incentives for people to earn higher incomes, reducing potential growth in the economy and lowering tax revenues. If a self-employed person has earned forty-three thousand pounds by March, he is not going to want to earn anymore, becasue he will lose his child benefit. How will they manage self-employed people? Typically, their incomes are not calculated until the end of the tax year. If the previous year they earned less than the higher rate threshold, will they have to repay the child benefit for that year? If they can't repay it, will they be sent to prison?
Great, so you're going to completely ignore Ignition's point about the structural deficit by simply re-stating your position.

Way to advance a discussion. Not.
Chris is offline   Reply With Quote