Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy
This is not a question about whether the state support the children of those who earn a middle income, this is about those who earn less, paying more than those who earn a high income. Then Boy George still has the audacity to continue to quote bad Disney teen movies.
|
I think it is about whether the state should support the children of higher earners, and I think the answer is 'no'. You can argue over what you consider high earners, but the principle seems sound to me.
Quote:
|
As for your comment about affording children, that is a bit silly and a very stale cliché isn't it.
|
No it's not. Why do you think it is? In fact, I think there is a case to be made for abolishing child benefits after the second child.