Quote:
Originally Posted by danielf
As said: the implementation is not necessarily fair, but the move itself is good in my opinion. Over a certain income individuals should not be looking at the state (or tax benefits) to support their children. And if you can't afford it you shouldn't have four or five children. Ideally, this would be tapered and looking at joint income. I think there is something to be said for avoiding the administrative cost of doing so though.
|
This is not a question about whether the state support the children of those who earn a middle income, this is about those who earn less, paying more than those who earn a high income. Then Boy George still has the audacity to continue to quote bad Disney teen movies.
As for your comment about affording children, that is a bit silly and a very stale cliché isn't it.