View Single Post
Old 04-10-2010, 14:26   #42
danielf
cf.mega poser
 
danielf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,687
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
Re: Child Benefit Scrapped For Higher Rate Tax Payers From 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy View Post
How many of the remaining five million families will be dual income earners, each earning an average of twenty-five thousand pounds a year? A good deal more than those single earners, earning more than forty-four thousand.
It seems to me there are two issues here: One is whether high earners should receive CB. The second is whether there should be a difference between single and dual income families. I think the answer to both should be 'no'. Unfortunately the answer to the second question presently is 'yes'. It's still better than doing nothing at all though. This move will mostly affect high earners, as there will be dual income families amongst those affected as well.
__________________
Remember kids: We are blessed with a listening, caring government.
danielf is offline   Reply With Quote