View Single Post
Old 04-10-2010, 13:14   #35
danielf
cf.mega poser
 
danielf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,687
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
Re: Child Benefit Scrapped For Higher Rate Tax Payers From 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien View Post
That is a pretty absurd confluence of events you have concocted though. In the event that someone is mistakenly taxed at 40%, and somehow doesn't notice he is being taxed at 40% for two years, and is claiming child benefit which is then stopped (surely that might rise a red flag in the reduced salary doesn't?) then you hypothetically suggest that benefit won't be paid?
Actually, it's pretty certain the employee would notice being incorrectly taxed at 40% if his child benefits were stopped. Good diagnostic!
__________________
Remember kids: We are blessed with a listening, caring government.
danielf is offline   Reply With Quote