View Single Post
Old 24-09-2010, 14:51   #13
Flyboy
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,375
Flyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful one
Re: Father poses as his own schoolboy son to snare paedophile on MSN

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary L View Post
[/URL]

I've never understood this kind of thing. how can you ban someone from using/doing/eating something when they're at home?
It would be just the banning of using MSN, he would be banned from possessing or using a computer full stop.

---------- Post added at 14:51 ---------- Previous post was at 14:49 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek View Post
It isn't so much enforcing it as using it as an excuse for further punishment if the ban is breached. It's pretty trivial to prove someone has been using MSN etc. and if they are banned from doing so due to a history of grooming attempts then they can be hauled up in front of a judge and given an alternative punishment that involves a stay in one of her majesties bed and breakfasts.
Besides, he'll have at least seven years to forget about using a computer again.
Flyboy is offline   Reply With Quote