Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
The children's identity is protected by law. The Press could state that the children are related to the perpetrators, but would then be unable to name the perpetrators (as this would lead to identification of the victims). On the other hand, they can do what they actually have done - name the perps, and not give any details about the relationship of the children to them (if any).
To guard against 'jigsaw identification' of the children, the agreed policy of the British media is that all of them will name the perpetrator and none of them will state what relationship the victim may have to them.
|
didn't know that
---------- Post added at 19:10 ---------- Previous post was at 19:08 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maggy J
Well who had the bad judgement to leave them with the couple in the first place?
|
i agree, however they could of been all face and been really nice people maybe even long term friends so something like this would not even be going through there mind, or on the other hand perhaps the parents were just plain stupid ?