View Single Post
Old 12-09-2010, 11:41   #17
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaiNasty View Post
My recent comparisons show my property investment to have done rather better than my PP scheme.
With hindsight I would have been better off forgetting about a private pension and instead buying another house or two.
Which is precisely the reason my own home is unaffordable for me

Dear Gordon's fault for removing the higher rate tax relief - people invest in property, property goes up in value making it yet more attactive, more people invest, etc, etc. Causes minor issues for people like me who would traditionally be able to purchase a home though. Anyway slightly off topic.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote