Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
I didn't intend taking the thread off topic, hence why I asked "could you revist the thread and post the figures and the "trusty source" details?"
That said, I was hoping for a more factually based reply which you had indicated previously was available to you rather than one based on "the reality is that there is no answer" or "reputedly receiving".
Thanks anyway.
|
My original question was open ended, because I wanted to know if anyone else had any idea if my information was correct. I did find it hard to believe that it was discretionary with no upper limit in certain cases, although internet searches did not reveal this.
Subject closed from me.