Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
Your point has no relevance whatsoever.
The facts are plain.
An influx of Romanians have decended on France (in this example). France did not invite them.
They have no money and no means to pay for accommodation.
They build a shanty town, they have no running water, drainage or sanitary amenities
The are involved in criminal activities.
The French authorities are doing the right thing by offloading them back to Romania. If they want to build a shanty town there they can, and the Romanian government can sort out their own mess. Why should France, or any other country have to deal with it.
These Romanians are not being persecuted, as you would romatically envisage. The fact is that these particular Romanians "are" troublemakers as they are in a place where they are not supposed to be, building a camp they are not supposed to build, being involved in criminal activity.
They could be Romanian, Dutch, English or marshian - they should be turfed out and sent back to Romania where I'm sure they'll be welcomed with open arms by the rest of the population who, I'm sure, have all been persecuted terribly and they can all build one big shanty town together and live happilly ever after.
|
Whilst you've proved you can write it appears that sadly you can't read.
France & the EU are obliged to accomodate fellow European citzens. The UNICEF report which I linked to, together with various other quantifiable sources - somewhat more enlightened than your opinion on the matter - clearly identify persecution as a systemic issue as far as Roma gypsies are concerned.
Just because you don't think it to be so does not mean it isn't so.
Again your assertion
"these particular Romanians "are" troublemakers" and
"... involved in criminal activity" are as unfounded, generalistic and xenophobic as the very similar (and now politically disputed / challenged) rantings of Sarkozy(i) which you are parroting.
There are none so blind as those who cannot see.