Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
Before the trial she hadn't said that she would uncover her face. It was only after the trial had started and the issue was raised that she said that she would abide by the judge's decision. Did the Mail pick up the story before the witness spoke about it?
|
It was reported on the 19th in both newspapers (as the ruling happened that day), and the Adelaide Now paper stated that the lady was not in court to hear the decision but has
said previously she would comply with the court decision; aligned with the fact that the Daily Mail reports uses most of the same wording as the Oz reports, remembering that Adelaide is about 12 hours ahead of UK time, I believe your premise (imho) is unlikely.
