Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers
With your wobbly logic you would claim you are not HIV+, however you cannot be certain without testing for it, hence the wobbly nature of your logic.
How is it wobbly logic to say "I do not know if I'm HIV+ because I've never had a test" when it's an accurate statement (damn sight more accurate than claiming something is true when it's not been tested).
There is a huge difference between saying "I'm not likely to be infected" and what you've actually claimed which is "I've never been infected in the past 10 years"
|
In which case, your wobbly logic is at odds with the entire British justice system. You appear to be conveniently ignoring the concept of
reasonable doubt or certainty and hanging your entire argument on the existence of a theoretical risk. A bit pointless, really, seeing as my iMac exists in the real world, not a debating chamber.