View Single Post
Old 20-06-2010, 05:41   #321
TheDaddy
cf.mega pornstar
 
TheDaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 19,183
TheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden aura
TheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden aura
Re: FIFA World Cup 2010 South Africa

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ View Post
Are you serious? Not the usual hype? Are we living in different countries? It's been exactly the same this year as it always is.
I don't think it has and if anything it should have been considering alot foreign betting exchanges had England down as second favourites to win it....

---------- Post added at 05:41 ---------- Previous post was at 04:20 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by gazfan View Post
No it didn't continue working - but does that mean the concept is wrong?

In the 2006 World Cup there were 80 players who were with Premier League clubs - 21 were in the England squad.

We can only discuss 'what if' in the context of the thread & my opinion can't be 'proven', but I would still rather the Premier League restricted the number of foreign players & allowed more English ones the chance to develop.

- otherwise we just have to 'agree to disagree'
I doubt we have ever had a more talented squad of players since the days of Finney, Matthews, Mortenson, Lawton and Mannion. This so called 'golden generation' has won or come near to winning nothing which tells me the problem is more to do with the managers more than the team, rather than selecting the best players perhaps we should be selecting the best team, just like we did in '66.
TheDaddy is offline   Reply With Quote