Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy
No you didn't. What you did refer to was a quote from the police saying, "We are aware that there is a potential threat," then the Daily Heil adding there own bit with, "and an officer has been assigned to guard the family's home." There is nothing in those reports that the police have confirmed that they are protecting the family from any kind of threat from anyone. If the police had said that they were, don't you think these so-called newspapers would have reported it?
|
so the police are aware of a potential threat
....i said that
Quote:
A police source said: 'We are aware that there is a potential threat', and an officer has been assigned to guard the family's home.
|
so the police have assigned an officer to gaurd the family home ....i said that
please read posts before spouting rubbish
if you want to doubt every report that is posted in this forum that is your perogative as far as i am concerened you are going back on ignore
---------- Post added at 19:39 ---------- Previous post was at 19:33 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius
Then you know why i am so vocal in both my anti hunt attitude and my stance on here.
|
and i fully support any reasonable anti hunt actions but will never support any of the mindless acts of vandalism or terrorism (for want of a better word) done by activists,on both sides of the argument it has to be said ,wether they are done via the internet or in person