Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh
i personally don't think a cull is in order i do think that they should not be fed or treated for desease when a member of the public finds a injured or deseased fox it should be put down not restored to health .I have no idea what you are trying to say in the rest of the paragraph re.becoming vicious blood thirsty animals
now could you answer my question ...what do think attacked the babies given that the fox was discovered in the bedroom next to the injured babies with no other animals reported in the house
|
I'm afraid you have quoted my post from before I editted it, yet you did post a response well after I editted it. please reread my post from the forum, not an email alert. there is a big gap in time there (17 minutes between my edit and you quoting response).
I'm not making any definitive decision on what caused the injuries because thus far, there is no clear cut evidence that goes beyond circumstancial. however, the
reports do point to it being a fox attack. however, I know that as a parent, if I found something attacking my child, I'd kill it myself, yet no attempt appears to have been made to even apprehend the fox, which (depending on which paper you get your info from) was just standing there looking at the mother whilst she screamed. does that not strike you as odd? second to that, there is a photo
believed to be the fox that attacked - yet there appears to be no blood on it. odd? and why, if it were scared away by screams and then lots of people, noise and flashing lights, would it come back in the midst of it all and peer through the window? perhaps it was attracted by all the commotion? who knows?
at the end of the day, regardless of how I have worded any responses, I still believe that we should step down from being judge and jury in a situation where there is no
proof of it being a fox, regardless of the likelihood and circumstances. it's a dangerous place to stand.