But Gary - your logic only works if there were only 3 in the finaly; there were 10 in the final, not 3; the top three out of the 10 then did not have another round to find out who came first, second and third.
I can see this is going to go round in circles, as your definitions of reality, fact and logic often is dissonant with the widely accepted versions of those words.
---------- Post added at 11:22 ---------- Previous post was at 11:21 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy
Sounds to me that you are using the Cameron method of what it means to win.
|
Ooooh - sore loser, or what.
If Brown had been on BGT, and he came second, he would not have left the stage, and would have insisted he had won, because a majority of voters did not vote for the first place contestant.
