[Mr Angry]

Originally Posted by Chrysalis

mr angry.

I think you are just so blind its not worth discussing this with you.

You are, of course, entitled to your opinion - even if it is based in fantasy.

Originally Posted by Chrysalis

You think I dont know what I am talking about when I point out there is and will be letters going out to people who's connection hasnt touched pirated content?

Did I say that or did you imagine that I said it?

Originally Posted by Chrysalis

If you think the detection is 100% reliable you are the one who is misinformed.

I think you'll find back here on planet tangible reality nowhere have I said that I think the detection will be 100% reliable. Your paranoid imagination is running away with you.

Originally Posted by Chrysalis

My point is as well on the counter is why do I need a solicitor to take action against the media companies but they need to only have 3 letters sent to get me cutoff?

I thought you said earlier that you had read and understood the document?

Originally Posted by Chrysalis

But I will stop caring about this anyway.

Yes, please do. Your proposed defence in the event that they litigate is <irony>rock solid</irony> and you have nothing to worry about.

Originally Posted by Chrysalis

They cannot police this no matter how they try barring the uk internet going into lockdown with every port been blocked.

If they cannot police it then why (in the name of sanity) are you so intent on emphasising the apparent injustice of them being able to sue you and cut you off?

Simply tell them "you cannot police this, there is no evidence whatsoever that internet piracy reduces sales". Remember to click your heels three times and it will all go away - just like a bad dream.

Originally Posted by Chrysalis

The media companies (and now the parliament) is just too out of touch to realise whats going on.

Yes, of course. That's right. They'd do well to come to this thread in order that they might see the error of their ways and bask in your wisdom on the subject.

Here is the news.

Outside of your tiny, selfish little world where you battle with the demons in your head to convince yourself that illegal downloading is a victimless crime there are thousands of people (to take but one grouping) previously in point of sale retail jobs - not "The media companies" but sales persons, van drivers, delivery men and women who have lost their jobs because people like you have no concept, whatsoever, of reality or social / socioeconomic responsibility.

You prefer to post childish, inane, ill founded, selfish self centred "opinions" which, when clearly refuted, you can't even be bothered to defend or expand on without making yourself look entirely socially inept as far as rational debate is concerned.

Originally Posted by Chrysalis

Its nothing more than a few corporates moaning about the fact they cant adapt to a new market and their profits are not as high as they like (they not losing money).

See above.

Originally Posted by Chrysalis

In america they even trying to get tv companies to block analogue recording now.

Your world must be really falling apart now.

Originally Posted by Chrysalis

Whenever someone from the copyright holders gets interviewed they also get very agressive when questioned about copyright.

I wonder why?

Is it perhaps due to the fact that they, like me, find the idea that people peddling the notion "there is no evidence whatsoever that internet piracy reduces sales" should be allowed out on the streets unsupervised somewhat worrying?

As you suggested, I think it's best if you move along.