Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
Yes but I think we can understand his intentions where not corrupt. He did not want to scam the taxpayer and make a profit out of them. He wanted to cover up his relationship, and when the rules changed it would have meant revealing that so he carried on his agrement knowing it was now wrong. Yes, that's bad but honestly, it's not corrupt or sinister it's a human struggling with their personal issues.
|
Excuse me but there were others who did things expenses wise that they shouldn't have and may or may not had the best of intentions but they got no leeway.Why should this person?
Funny how the tune has changed now it's a new government.
Frankly I can't care less about him and his sexuality.It's not an issue for me and in this day and age it's a bit specious to claim it is pertinant to the situation. It's total rot as most wouldn't have given the fact a second thought.