Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar
I wonder how many more of these the ToryGraph has squirreled away, just waiting to de-rail a coalition they don't agree with?
|
It would only been identified as an issue
after the relationship link had been established. The details of the expenses would have been public, which meant anybody else could of reported the story before now if the link was apparent all along. So it's not the Telegraph holding onto the story. If the Conservatives had won a majority then releasing the story now would have had less of an impact. It would have made more sense to release the story before the election. That's assuming the accusations of certain ridiculously biased people are true.
He took out a mortgage to give/lend to his partner, so that Mr Lundie could buy an expensive house. If it was a loan, how was Mr Lundie going to pay it back? Could Mr Lundie have afforded to buy the expensive house if he wasn't receiving the rent.
The expenses were for a room that would not have been used for sleeping in. That implies fraud whatever any relationship was or wasn't there.