Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
Whilst I don't agree with the current buckshot blanket issuing of letters on the part of some of these firms the fact still remains that were it not for people engaging in illegal downloading to steal media / softwares then these firms would not have the inclination to operate that particular business model.
|
I fully agree with you. My main worry is that the isps will see this as a reason to push for access to the data from the equipment they are forced to install. They could say that the money made from access to the data will help fund the cost of supplying the large amount of data that COULD be requested by the lawyers who jump on the bandwagon of sue sue sue.
Its a lot of could's or if's but it makes me worried as to where we will end up with this.
---------- Post added at 09:48 ---------- Previous post was at 09:45 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
How does an ISP benefit from something that they will have to pay for in order to enforce?
|
I feel that the Deep packet inspection kit to be installed in half of VM's network will not only be used for p2p checking. It will in my eye's evolve very quickly when they see the benefits of a phorm type off shoot.