View Single Post
Old 23-05-2010, 14:53   #503
Damien
Remoaner
Cable Forum Mod
 
Damien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,943
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Re: [Update] The Liberal-Conservative Coalition

Quote:
Originally Posted by punky View Post
That's the point. People that live together share the same backgrounds and same concerns do vote for the same people. When the majority of people agree on something it makes the seat safe.

If you draw a big circle around south Manchester including Longsight, Fallowfield and Moss Side to the north and then Prestbury and Wilmslow to the south, who is going to win? The inner cities will always outnumber the suburbs and the countryside.

Or in the south, should Tower Hamlets and Chigwell really be run by the same MP?[COLOR="Silver"]
But the boundaries are arbitrary, and they continue to be redrawn. It's not about any demographics of an area being met. We end up with cases like Oxford which, as a whole, voted Liberal Democrat but the boundaries are drawn in such a way that their vote was spread across the three constituencies and they won not a single seat. Constant gerrymandering by the leading parties is not democratic.
Damien is offline   Reply With Quote