Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
|
Pierre, at no stage did I mention, suggest or bring to the debate the issue of fox hunts killing cats, accidental or otherwise. You introduced the cat analogy.
The animal referenced in the link I provided is what is known as a "dog".
Allow me to elaborate in order to assist you with your particular quandary;
cat and
dog.
They are two very different species.
Evidently you are still having issues with the interpretation of statements made in basic english and relating same to the time / order / context in which those statements are made.
This seems to be an issue peculiar only to you in this thread. You are entirely, and I suspect intentionally, continuing to miss the point in an attempt to save face.
You said....
"I suppose if someone was out for a leisurely drive in their car or on their motorbike and ran over a cat we'd all be reeling back in shock and horror, and calling for driving for enjoyment to be banned".
And I replied...
"I don't think so, unless of course the persons in question went out with a collection of their friends all similarly dressed with the express intention of running over a cat in the guise of it being a sport of some sort".
Others have also pointed out the fact that you have misinterpreted the gist of my posts - move along.