View Single Post
Old 20-05-2010, 18:09   #77
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 48
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Human Rights Act to be retained

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaiNasty View Post
But that's my point. It should not be *OUR* responsibility to find a country to take them. If you had a guest in your house that abused your hospitality you would require them to leave. In exactly the same way, if someone abuses our country's welcome we should require them to leave. The logistics of where and how they go should not be our concern.
Ok, think of it like this with your analogy, they can't go outside there is no "outside" all they can do is leave your house and directly enter someone else's house.
Now if that other house refuses to let them in, the only place they can go is back to your house.
You can try to refuse to let them in, but then you get the situation like the Terminal, or are you expecting them to live off the airline?
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote