View Single Post
Old 20-05-2010, 17:30   #74
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 48
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Human Rights Act to be retained

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaiNasty View Post
Why do we have to actually deport people back to a specific country?
Surely it would be enough to say that they are no longer welcome in the UK and leave it to them to decide where they go. I believe in ancient times it was called 'banishment'. Where somebody is a serious criminal or security risk the court should be able to say that they have a set amount of time to leave this country. Leave it to them where and how as that is really not our responsibility.
The problem with that is if the destinaton country doesn't want them, they can just refuse them entry and force them back onto the vehicle which brought them.
Quite often we have to try and find other countries willing to take them simply because if they go back to where they were born they'd have their human rights infringed. Makes the whole thing cost a hell of a lot more and last a hell of a lot longer than it needs to.
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote