View Single Post
Old 20-05-2010, 16:43   #71
Dai
Inactive
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lincoln UK
Age: 77
Services: 50Mb, TV & Phone
Posts: 3,673
Dai is cast in bronzeDai is cast in bronzeDai is cast in bronzeDai is cast in bronze
Dai is cast in bronzeDai is cast in bronzeDai is cast in bronzeDai is cast in bronzeDai is cast in bronzeDai is cast in bronzeDai is cast in bronzeDai is cast in bronzeDai is cast in bronzeDai is cast in bronzeDai is cast in bronzeDai is cast in bronzeDai is cast in bronzeDai is cast in bronzeDai is cast in bronzeDai is cast in bronzeDai is cast in bronze
Send a message via MSN to Dai
Re: Human Rights Act to be retained

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers View Post
What if they're found guilty of being a vicious murderous killer?
If they are willing to kill someone with the knowledge that they'll be deported to a country where their sexual orientation or gender identification puts them at proven risk of imprisonment, torture or execution, then they have accepted that risk, just as if they'd jumped on a plane home of their own accord.
Why do we have to actually deport people back to a specific country?
Surely it would be enough to say that they are no longer welcome in the UK and leave it to them to decide where they go. I believe in ancient times it was called 'banishment'. Where somebody is a serious criminal or security risk the court should be able to say that they have a set amount of time to leave this country. Leave it to them where and how as that is really not our responsibility.
Dai is offline   Reply With Quote