View Single Post
Old 19-05-2010, 15:23   #462
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: [Update] The Liberal-Conservative Coalition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy View Post
These excuses are all well and good, but they do not detract from the fact that you viewed Guido Fawkes's website; for what? The only reason to do so would be to find some dirt on an MP, particulalry a Labour one, seeing as it their raison d'ĂȘtre. Did he not report on Eric Illsley? Did he mention minister's fourth homes?
OK So you can't disagree with what I said. Didn't think so.

This is a new experience for me, I've never been told why I read something before.

If we're discussing Guido and your accusation that he purely digs dirt on Labour MPs just a very quick scroll down to this, a nice juicy story on a Tory Secretary of State and this directly conflicting with likely ConLib coalition policy just from the front page without looking further would appear to disagree.

I read that, amongst many other things. Reading widely gives a more balanced view of things allowing a more informed opinion I find.

Just for your information I've raised concerns over said Tory Secretary of State's ability to be unbiased over the decision in question with my MP.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote