View Single Post
Old 19-05-2010, 01:19   #63
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 48
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Human Rights Act to be retained

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBKing View Post
Because we're the good guys. End of story.
We aren't forcing them to comit serious crimes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBKing View Post
Mind you, we're perfectly happy deporting people to Iraq, Iran and Zimbabwe even now, so if you're worried that we aren't deporting enough people to dangerous or murderous regimes, rest assured we probably are and you can leave the HRA alone, thanks.
But you said we're the good guys. Wait a minute! If you're wrong about that, maybe you're wrong about everything else you've said.
After all, I made the comment that when it comes to deportation, human rights can't be removed, which you tried to suggest wasn't the case, yet dear Auntie reported today that someone's deportation cannot go ahead not because they hadn't had a fair trial, but because their human rights cannot be removed. Looks like you were wrong with that too then.
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote