|
Re: Young lad dies, after refusing blood
All I can say is that I have respect for this lad ultimately 'keeping his faith'.
But I also question a faith that demands such a sacrifice - especially when, as Arthur points out, there are 'blood substitutes' available that may have saved the boy's life.
- and I also wonder whether the 'eating' blood taboo that seems to be at the core of the prohibition does actually apply to a transplant?
|